Evidence · Readiness

Ready for what?

Replace a broad readiness label with a responsibility, conditions, evidence, and a clear statement of what is still unknown.

Mike Vaughan · September 26, 2026 · 2 min read


“She's ready for a bigger role.”

That may be a sound judgment. It may also conceal several different judgments: she knows the work, she performed well in a familiar setting, she has the support she needs, or someone believes she will grow into the responsibility.

Before using the statement to make a decision, unpack it.

Name the responsibility

In an illustrative example, the proposed responsibility is to lead a limited customer rollout. It includes choosing the initial customer group, coordinating support, explaining trade-offs to a sponsor, and deciding when to pause.

Those are different demands. A good planning exercise may demonstrate some and leave others untouched.

“Ready to plan a limited rollout with sponsor support” is narrower than “ready to lead change.” Its limits make it more useful.

Describe the conditions

What information did the person have? How much time? Which tools? Did someone point out the critical dependency? Was the task familiar? Was the recommendation made alone or as part of a team?

These details change what an observation means. A supported success is still a success; it simply supports a claim about performance with that support.

Write the evidence before the conclusion

A record might say: “The participant checked whether the pilot covered legacy customers, identified a support constraint, and proposed a restricted release with a review point.”

Then state the interpretation: “This supports further supervised responsibility for rollout planning.”

Then state the gap: “We have not observed the participant negotiating that recommendation with a resistant sponsor, or handling an unexpected service failure.”

The gap is not a defect in the person. It is a limit in the evidence.

Let the person examine the record

Someone may have noticed a constraint but been prevented from acting on it. A team output may conceal who contributed the decisive question. An evaluator may have misunderstood an explanation.

Give the person a way to add context and contest an interpretation. That makes the evidence more useful for development and easier to inspect when it informs a consequential decision.

Decide what comes next

You may assign the limited responsibility with support, arrange another observation, or provide practice on the missing demand. The evidence should help choose between those actions.

Avoid converting incomplete observations into a universal percentage of readiness. A precise-looking number does not resolve an imprecise claim.

Use this wording: “Ready for ___, under ___ conditions, based on ___. We still need evidence about ___.”

Build an evidence plan for a responsibility you are considering now.

Bring a real problem

What does your learning need to change?

A role people are struggling with. A decision that keeps going wrong. A capability you need to see before giving someone more responsibility. Start there.

Talk with Mike

Find an idea in the writing

Try

AI-generated guidance based on the writing here. Each question is answered independently. Questions and responses are stored to help identify gaps in the writing; do not enter confidential or personal employee information.